1_up ([info]1_up) wrote,
@ 2005-12-11 18:42:00
Previous Entry  Add to memories!  Tell a Friend  Next Entry
I read this book recently about how to workout better and smarter. It was great. I learned all these cool things, and I want to talk about them.

For those of you who know me well enough, you know I'm in pretty good shape and exercise regularly. If you know me better, you may also know that I've been in pretty much the same shape for years now. Even though I knew this, I hadn't really pursued means of figuring out why and how to change it, I was just happy enough. Well, now I know.

If you're not a person who works out at all, and you just start suddenly, you'll gain muscle quick. So you get excited, jump on the whole '3 times a week' idea and start training like a madman. Like 90% of people out there, including me, you'll soon be overtraining. '3 times a week' is an absolute myth, in regards to weight training anyway. Aerobic stuff, sure, that's fine, but muscles, no way.

Simply, the stronger you get, the LESS you must train. If you do it right (I'll get to that in a sec). You see, you're muscles get stronger if you train right, and the stronger you get, the heavier weights you must lift, therefore you will have increased stress on your body. Your muscles aren't the only part of your body that needs to recover, your organs and everything else need to also - they don't grow and get strong like your muscles (well, a little, but not comparitively). Pro weight lifters lift twice a month. That's it. You need to recover 100% before you even workout again, or it's all for naught.

But that's not the great thing I learned, that's just one of the benefits of doing what I am going to explain now. The key to building muscle is High Intensity Training. This book I read explains how to measure it in regards to weight, reps, and time to do your exercise. A simple calcuation on those figured gives you a number called your Power Factor. If this number goes up every time you workout, you are making progress. The faster you workout, plus the higher your weight, and higher your amount of reps, the higher your Power Factor is. Pretty simple to understand really. It sounds very simple, and most people would assume that many people already do this, but the catch is that most do not keep track of their time. They'll take long breaks, grab a drink of water in between sets, etc. That throws it all off. To keep your muscles at their peak performance and make the workout 'High Intensity' you gotta track the time.

In addition to that, I learned that the common full-range motion method of exercising is vastly inefficient to 2 other methods. While it doesn't matter what you do when you start lifting (cause you'll put on mucle regardless) after you hit a plateau, you should REALLY switch to one of these two methods.

The first is Strong Range Partials. Basically, you only life the weight in the strongest range of the movement, but increase the weight 50-100% of what you normally do. Studies have proven this to build muscle MUCH faster with MUCH less time consuming workout (only 2-3 sets per MUSCLE!). The downside to this is that you either need a Smith Machine for safety, or a spot to help you, all the time, othewise you will NEVER get the weight up to your strongest range. The other option here, however (since the calculation involves reps and time, too), is to incrase your reps or decrease time or both. Although increasing them is less favorable than increasing weight, if you're in a situation where you can't find a Smith Machine or a spot, like me, this is what you have to try.

The other method is Static Contraction Training. Basically, you just move the weight to the end of the lift and hold it. The amount of weight you use should be so heavy that you can only hold it for 5-10 seconds. Next time you do the workout, adjust the weight so that you can do it only for 5-10 seconds again, because you WILL get stronger. Once again, this includes really heavy weight and needs a spot or a Smith Machine again, can't sub for reps or time here so you got no choice.

The only difference between the two in effectiveness is that Static Contraction is WAY faster. The workout are much shorter, which lead many people to believe that they need to workout more, so for you gym junkies who LIKE to workout, I recommend Strong Range Partials. That's what I am going to start with.

The best thing, too, is right off the start you get a two workouts a week plan, Workout A and Workout B, and these men have idenfitied the best exercises for each workout, as well as which body parts in which order. You START only twice a week! I think that's awesome. After a few weeks of tracking your improvements, they will slow down, which means you need to workout less frequently. Supposedly, in a few months, even I could be working out only twice a month.

To be honest, I've heard about people who don't workout a lot and are huge, but I never really saw it or knew the knowledge behind it which makes it sensible, but now I think I do.

I took all the calculations in the book, as well as the workout plan, and even made a really nice spreadsheet to track my growth, as well as printouts to take to the gym and record my exercises. All I need to get now is a stop watch.

I could say more, but if you are interested I can just email the book to you. It's an e-book. Or you can e-mule it like I did; Training Smart, by Pete Sisco.

I'm really pumped, I can't wait to start this new training. I've been in the same shape for so long. Although, I'm not sure my apt complex gym is what I really need. I mean, as it is, I'm already throwing up the entire rack for the chest machine. I hate these little pathetic machines that only go up to like 250, it's SO retarded. I may have to join a real gym.

Anyway, hope you found this interesting. Maybe after I start I'll post my progress - considering I can make good enough progress with my gym here.

Oh, and big ups to Amanda and Imran for their food ideas. I just cooked for the past few hours now and my fridge is full of foods based loosely on your suggestions, with a little personal twist. I've never made so much rice!

Peas out.



(11 comments) - (Post a new comment)


(Anonymous)
2005-12-12 01:51 am UTC (link)
Sounds very interesting! e-mail or E-mule I shall!

One question: does the book say anything about toning/strength building exercises that are not growth centered? What you describe are weight lifting techniques to get bigger, but would the same apply to toning and strength methods that are not meant to make muscles huge? There are smaller guys; best example off the top of my head, Bruce Lee, who are not big at all but are incredibly strong. Generally, that kind of body shape requires high rep workouts with less weight. I would like to maintain my body weight at 170lbs, which is why I would prefer to do strength exercises without putting on a lot of mass. Does the book mention anything in regards to that?

-Walid

(Reply to this) (Thread)


[info]1_up
2005-12-13 04:49 pm UTC (link)
It tells you how to maintain the body you want once you get it. You can't really say "I want to have small, extremely powerful, muscles", because that's all personal and genetic.

Bruce Lee may have been incredibly strong, but it was also his techniques and how he applied his strength (and I bet all sorts of other crazy training) that added to this.

(Reply to this) (Parent)


[info]ericmill
2005-12-13 02:44 am UTC (link)
This was awesome. I think I will find this book, but already you have helped me. Rockin!!

(Reply to this) (Thread)


[info]1_up
2005-12-13 04:50 pm UTC (link)
Yea, best of luck to ya. I've already given my gym a slight analysis and it looks like it will work for some exercises, but not all.

I'll have to make due with what I can for now I suppose. Until I start my next rotation, which will most likely be in the Boston Area! I'll keep you post'd!

(Reply to this) (Parent)


[info]jnick
2006-04-24 12:24 pm UTC (link)
Hmm. I do heavy-lifting 3 days a week ... Chest/legs on Monday, Arms on Wednesday, Back/Calves/Abs on Friday. Doin a full-body workout 3 days a week will kill you if you are doing it seriously.

BTW, I found your LJ linked off of Mill's... we went to WPI

(Reply to this) (Thread)


[info]1_up
2006-04-24 04:07 pm UTC (link)
All I can say is that after reading that book, I no longer will participate in, or advocate, a work out routine this does not adapt and evolve as the body does: static training yields static results.

Simply understanding the fact that as your body gets stronger you need more time to rest between workouts is enough to understand this - but reading the rest of the book backs it up with pure, uncontested, science.

I have been keeping logs and I know for a fact I'm getting stronger faster than I ever have in the past. It took time to get used to the intensity and form required to do it right, but it was completely worth it.

I almost feel like a fool for never measuring my progress and just believing that lifting and moving weight was going to just make me stronger.

(Reply to this) (Parent)(Thread)


[info]jnick
2006-04-25 03:23 pm UTC (link)
Well, I wouldn't call my program static training ... I'm always changing weights/reps and mixing it up. Usually I'll go for hypertrophy (low reps, high weight) for like 4 weeks, then go for edurance (low weight, high reps) for 4, etc, etc. Although lately I've been doing more core/functional training (stability ball, medicine ball, jumping over shit)... I find that stuff really fun and makes me "feel" better overall. If you're intrested in that sorta stuff there's a dude called JC Santana that's pretty good.

In the end, no matter what any research says, if it works for you than it works. Static Contraction Training sounds sorta like pulsing- you ever tried that? Apparently that's what turned your boy Arnold into the Mr. Olympia (oh yeah, he also needed a 2.3 metric tons of anabolic steriods).

I've been keeping a spreadsheet of my workouts for a while now... it's very cool to able to plot workouts and track progress. One issue that I have is sometimes I feel compelled to workout when I'm overly tired/over-trained, just so I can fill in a row like I had planned too.

(Reply to this) (Parent)(Thread)


[info]1_up
2006-04-25 04:19 pm UTC (link)
Well that's interesting. Constant variety and change in workouts is also very key to growth, as muscles adapt quicker than people think.

I can understand how a constant schedule like that would work if you are drasticaly changing it so much.

As far as the Static stuff goes, I think Im about to switch over to that. Many of the exercises Im doing now are getting tough because most of the machines dont support the kind of weight I need. Also, its getting harder and harder to keep better form with this kind of weight, and thats the key with these quick workouts. That, and I dont want to break my wrists quite yet ... ha

And yea, the Core sure is the rage these days, huh? Maybe I should check out that bandwagon ...

I also find taking time off hard to do also, so when I force myself to the gym, Ill just go for intense runs and do lots of cardio stuff - go as easy on the muscles as possible.

(Reply to this) (Parent)(Thread)


[info]jnick
2006-04-26 04:55 pm UTC (link)
When I'm trying to take an off-day from lifting I go the cardio route but also try to do some core/functional stuff. The stability ball is great for maintaining flexibilty, plus there are several exercises you can do that will definitely make you sore in places that you can't hit with free weights. I've had remarkable improvements in my golf game since I started down this route... it was almost an epiphany when I felt me core connecting my legs and shoulders.

I see in some of your other posts that you are in Boca Raton ... That dude I mentioned in the last post JC Santana, the guru of all the functional training stuff, is located there. If you are in the area it might be a good oppurtunity to take a class or training session with him or something... he is probably really expensive since he trains olympic athletes, but might be worth checking out so google his name. The tricky part is that this functional stuff won't give you 21" pythons, but really will make you stronger.

(Reply to this) (Parent)(Thread)


[info]1_up
2006-04-27 03:10 am UTC (link)
Interesting coincidence, maybe I will look him up.

On an off topic - have I ever met you before?

(Reply to this) (Parent)(Thread)


[info]jnick
2006-04-27 12:53 pm UTC (link)
No, I think we've sorta met before at a Kilroy party or something but never formally introduced (tho like that ever happens at WPI)... I'm pretty good friends with Mill, AJ, Dan G (my cousin), Jake, but I never did any Improv/GI/Kilroy/Empty Set/etc stuff... only Masque stuff.

(Reply to this) (Parent)


(11 comments) - (Post a new comment)

Create an Account
Forgot your login or password?
Login w/ OpenID
English • Español • Deutsch • Русский…